top of page

If you’re bored in science class - maybe you should be a scientist

Jun 7, 2018
4 min read

This month's My Science Story is brought to you by Josh Tycko, a graduate student in the Genetics department here at Stanford. Here, Josh describes why bored students should take their curiosity outside the classroom.

“Josh, why don’t you tell us the value of the gravitational constant G?”

“... Sorry… what was the question…?”

Somehow, I had dozed off in fourth period physics again. This was a common occurrence in 12th grade. How is it that I could stay up all night reading Stephen Hawking’s physics classic, A Briefer History of Time [1], but then couldn’t stay awake in an actual physics classroom?

I stumbled across two things this week that got me thinking about how we’re taught science.

The first was an ad for a brand called ~~THEORY~~ that takes itself very seriously, but says something laughable:

“Ideas become theories, theories become reality.”

🤦🏻

The second was a viral tweet that says something both hilarious, and seriously important:

A kid in a safe environment is curious about the world. They will make observations, they will learn new things by trial & error [2]. We’re born scientists. A poll of 500,000 students found 80% of elementary students were “engaged” in the classroom. However, by high school, only 40% were still “engaged” [3, 4].

A lot of this is due to active and systemic dissuasion from the sciences that’s especially directed towards women and minoritized groups [5]. Amber and Susanna talk about how they handled these roadblocks in their blog posts. Another reason is that science in the classroom can sometimes be...boring.

I think the ad and the tweet can show us what’s gone wrong and how we fix it. Scientific theories do not “become reality," they’re not something to be swallowed whole and then regurgitated onto standardized tests. (Or at least, they shouldn’t be.) But asking “how we know they’re right?” is exactly what a scientist does. What’s the evidence? What techniques were used? Did they introduce bias? Does the data support their argument? Can we ever really be 100% sure they’re “objectively” right? What does objective mean?

This skepticism, creativity, and curiosity, is what makes science exciting.

In the words of education reformer Sir Ken Robinson, we need to create a “culture of curiosity, not a culture of compliance.” [6]

What can you do as a student who loves science* but is getting bored in class? In my experience, and according to studies [7] (science!), the best kind of learning is hands-on and personalized. I found that personalized education in college when I asked a professor, Dr. Jim Wilson, if I could work in his gene therapy laboratory. I loved the hands-on learning so much more than the classroom learning that I took a semester off to do experiments in the lab full-time. I had an awesome project inventing a new type of vaccine, so I was motivated to study the relevant fields. That self-motivated learning made me more excited about learning in the classroom when I went back to school.

Too often in science, we’re told to master all the foundational basics before trying to go do scientific research ourselves. One education expert, David Perkins, says that instead we should “play the whole game, just at a junior level” - the same way we learn soccer [8, 9]. I got that chance when I joined a student-run genetic engineering competition called iGEM, standing for the International Genetically Engineered Machines competition. We were paired with an advisor, Dr. Brian Chow, who helped us not only do supervised research, but rather to ask our own questions and design our own experiments. Most failed, but a few worked! We went on to win the North American grand prize. We went outside the lab, working with doctors, designers, and bioethicists to understand and publicly communicate the societal impacts of our chosen area, epigenetic engineering. I was hooked. Fast forward five years and I do hands-on epigenetic engineering every day as a PhD student at Stanford.

Josh and his iGEM teammate reading up on molecular biology in 2013

Josh and his iGEM teammate reading up on molecular biology in 2013.

Why were these hands-on, outside-the-classroom, science problems so much more exciting to me as a student? One of the early researchers of creativity, Jacob Getzels, identified three types of problems that a student can work on [10]:

  1. Presented problems - the student is given a problem that has a known solution

  2. Discovered problems - the student finds an existing problem that may already have a solution

  3. Created problems - the problem did not exist until the student asked their question

Solving a “created problem” is not just personally meaningful - it can permanently change the world around you. This is why science is really, really, really not boring.

If you don’t want to memorize “what”, without understanding “why” -

If you want to solve problems that don’t have answers instead of the ones that already do -

If you want to know who invented math, and you want to know if they’re right -

If you’re bored in science class -

maybe you should be a scientist. You might already be.

Keep reading!

  1. https://brieferhistoryoftime.com/

  2. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/is-america/201502/are-kids-curious

  3. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/ed/17/01/bored-out-their-minds

  4. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/03/23/gallup-student-poll-finds-engagement-in-school.html

  5. https://www.nature.com/scitable/content/does-gender-matter-by-ben-a-barres-10602856 (click ‘full screen’ to download the article)

  6. https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity

  7. https://www.nature.com/news/why-we-are-teaching-science-wrong-and-how-to-make-it-right-1.17963

  8. https://www.amazon.com/Making-Learning-Whole-Principles-Transform/dp/0470633719

  9. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/learning_deeply/2018/01/a_pernicious_myth_basics_before_deeper_learning.html

  10. http://www.creativitypost.com/education/science_is_boring

Google these things to find a culture of curiosity!

  1. iGEM

  2. Robotics competitions

  3. Makerspaces

  4. DIY-bio spaces

  5. Math Corps

  6. Intel Science Talent Search

  7. Khan Academy Talent Search

  8. Fold-it and other ‘citizen science’ opportunities

* This probably applies to learning just about anything, not just science.

101 Comments


karentaylor06736
20 hours ago

There is something approachable about discussing making online tutoring sessions effective through situations people can actually picture. A clear question before a session can help the learner use the available time well. It makes me curious about the practical side of online tutoring support. I would be interested in a simple example, because it is often the ordinary details that make an idea memorable. How would you check that a tutoring explanation has actually become understandable?

Like

kimberlyking19545
a day ago

Considering sharing the everyday questions of parenthood, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. Small concerns can be easier to discuss when parents hear that others have similar questions. For me, that is a useful way into the broader subject of parenting support discussions. I am more curious about the process than a polished result, because the steps in between are usually where questions appear. What makes a parenting discussion feel helpful rather than competitive?

Like

edwardcampbell571
2 days ago

What draws my attention to building management skills through practical situations is the possibility of making an unfamiliar subject feel closer to everyday life. A realistic scenario can expose how different decisions affect a team's work. I would keep that thought nearby when looking for ideas about management skills training. I am more curious about the process than a polished result, because the steps in between are usually where questions appear. Which situations are most useful for practising management before taking responsibility for a team?

Like

lisajones46425
3 days ago

My first thought about sharing cultures through language learning is that the everyday experience deserves as much attention as the larger explanation. An everyday conversation can reveal cultural habits that a vocabulary list cannot explain. Seen this way, European cultural exchange becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. What kinds of shared activities make an exchange feel meaningful?

Like

marymartin67900
3 days ago

A conversation about planning the next step in graduate education seems most useful to me when it leaves space for uncertainty and further questions. A clear research interest can make a programme comparison more meaningful than a list of rankings. It makes me curious about the practical side of graduate study planning. I would probably come back to this question after trying to work through one concrete example rather than deciding immediately. What would help you decide whether a programme fits your learning goals?

Like
  • Facebook

@sciencepenpals

sbsa.png

Sponsored by Stanford Biosciences Student Association

Stanford, CA, USA

©2017 by Stanford Science PenPals. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page